CAST ha partecipato al 1° Evento Metrico 2015 organizzato dal GUFPI ISMA, associazione di riferimento nazionale per la misurazione del software in Italia, tenuto a Roma lo scorso 14 Maggio.
La conferenza ha visto la partecipazione di Cast sui seguenti 3 topics:
The growing problem of technical debt cannot be overlooked. InfoWorld Editor Eric Knorr recently highlighted the need for technical debt to be paid down, noting, “I wouldn’t be surprised to learn we’re now in the process of accumulating technical debt at historic rates.”
Technical debt is expected to exceed 1.5 million per business application.
As Larry Quinlan, Global CIO, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited explains, “CIOs need the courage to make the investments that reduce technical debt — and the knowledge and the team to know where and when to make those investments.”
Yet, despite the advances that give IT management proper visibility into the cost and quality of their application development, one issue still remains unresolved: accurate technical debt estimation. The issue resides in how technical debt is calculated and communicated to management.
Just like a species of insects can become resistant to a certain type of pesticide, a new strain of software bugs has emerged and is plaguing software developers and wreaking havoc on software quality — architecturally complex violations. Unlike a code-level bug, a system level defect involves interactions between several components, often spread across different levels of an application, making them much more difficult to find and fix.
And even though these types of violations only account for 10 percent of the total number of defects, they lead to ninety percent of the production issues — severely impacting software quality and technical debt.
When one of our writers, Lev Lesokhin, started contributing to Wall Street & Technology he was shocked to find very little on the subject of technical debt. Considering how much the concept intersects the worlds of finance and technology, he thought he’d find whole forums of IT guys and financiers exploring the intricacies en mass.
When he realized that was far from the case, he set out to create a guide to bridge the gap and get the conversation started. By taking some of the more complex concepts of technical debt and translating them into financial language, he hoped to bring the technical jargon out of the CIO boardroom and decipher it for a financial audience.
In the past decade, it’s become even more obvious that reducing software risk has one of the strongest correlations to cost and overall impact on the value of all applications. That is why last month we organized a CIO conference with our partners Steria in Belgium focused on software risk and productivity management. The objective of the conference was to identify a roadmap for efficient software risk and productivity management practices to better control cost, minimize risks, and increase the value of enterprise applications.
Don’t miss out on our videos from the conference exploring reducing business risks and improving productivity.